: Case Scenario Analysis

Assignment 2: Case Scenario Analysis and Discussion
Click here to read the two case scenarios.
Choose one of the two conflict scenarios (interpersonal and group to group) and use your conflict resolution model developed in Module 3 to help you:
Summarize what is happening in the scenario.
Identify who appears to have the power and ability to influence others’ decisions or actions.
Identify the level or depth of the conflict.
Then, use the conflict resolution model you developed in Module 3 to help you diagnose the makeup of the conflict and the prognosis. Also, use your self-assessment information from Module 2 to describe what you would do or attempt to do as a strategy toward resolution of this conflict. Address your assumptions, the contingencies, and how your self-assessment information will influence the strategy.
Your analysis should include information regarding all the points above and your recommended strategy to help resolve each conflict. Support your analyses and recommendations with course material, textbook, and independent scholarly research.
All written assignments and responses should follow current APA rules for attributing sources and formatting.
Your final product will be a Microsoft Word document, approximately 3–4 pages long, utilizing two to three scholarly sources. Save the response as AU_L7900_M6_A2_LastName_FirstInitial.doc.
Submission Details:
By Week 6, Day 7, deliver your assignment to the M6 Assignment 2 Dropbox.
Assignment 2 Grading Criteria
Maximum Points
Applied the personal conflict resolution model to accurately identify what is happening in the scenarios, who appears to have the power and ability to influence others’ decisions or actions, and the level or depth of conflict.
24
Applied self-assessment information to formulate a workable plan of action for the resolution of each scenario. Clearly stated and explained all assumptions, contingencies, and how your self-assessment information will influence the strategy.
28
Wrote in a clear, concise, and organized manner; demonstrated ethical scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources; and displayed accurate spelling, grammar, and punctuation.
8
Total:
60